Even though the iPhone 3G S isn't the major upgrade many were hoping for and most of its new features should have been included on the original iPhone two years ago, I was still happy when FedEx knocked on my door yesterday with my iPhone 3G successor in hand.
The improvement I was most looking forward to experiencing myself was the new handset's 600MHz ARM Cortex A8 processor, a significant upgrade from the 412MHz underclocked ARM11 CPU used in previous generations. There are many ways to measure a processor's performance, some much more scientific than others, but website load times are what I personally find most useful and easiest to understand. For my mobile internet needs, I prioritize faster over fuller so the lack of Flash support and other Web 2.0 requirements are a non-issue for me.
I've done website load time comparisons on multiple gadgets many times before (see "Related entries" below for relevant links), so the list of chosen websites and my testing parameters/disclaimer are the same as always:
- This was not a scientific study or professional lab test.
- Each browser's cache was cleared before each set of tests.
- Load times were measured from the same location (about 12 feet from a 802.11g wireless router) in Honolulu in a one-hour period from the click of the "Go" button to the complete page load according to the browser's progress bar.
- The same SIM card was used in both iPhones.
- Wi-Fi and 3G network signal strengths were at their max and consistent throughout the testing period.
- Load times vary by location, time of day, ad servers, content, etc., so your results may not be identical to mine.
|iPhone 3G S
(iPhone OS 3.0)
(iPhone OS 3.0)
|Micro PC Talk
It's been clear since I compared load times on the Archos 5 Internet Media Tablet (links below) that the Cortex A8 was closing the gap between ARM and x86 processors, and I think the iPhone 3G S's results solidify the CPU's ability to truly compete in the Intel MID space.
I've never agreed with those who considered the first two generations of the iPhone and iPod touch to be MIDs, not just because I was remaining faithful to Intel's definition but also because the internet experience provided by those devices was just too slow. Though an Intel MID still provides a more complete/full experience, I won't have to bite my tongue when someone uses the term to describe the iPhone 3G S . . . a true voice-enabled MID.