Would you buy an iPad 2.5?

The iPad 3 is special in one way: it’s not often you see a follow-up product that isn’t definitely better than what it’s replacing. The iPad 3 is heavier and thicker than the iPad 2, takes way longer to charge, doesn’t last as long on a charge, and is more expensive. What’s responsible for all of that? The screen. That “revolutionary”, 3 megapixel beast they put in there because people demanded it.

The big question when you think about this trade off is what the iPad 3 would be like without that screen. Let’s assume for a second that Apple stuck with the old type of screen, but kept all the other changes – including the thickness and weight. The new 32nm chip used in the $399 iPad 2 improves battery life over last year’s model, and have been measured to last over 15 hours when playing HD video. On a 25Wh battery. Imagine that device being powered by the 42.5Wh battery in the iPad 3 instead – 20 hours of use more or less regardless of what you do should be doable, and numbers closer to 30 hours for more power efficient tasks. Add to that a quad core graphics chip that is now being used to power the screen, but imagine it being used to actually improve graphics on games and such instead. Finally, that 5 megapixel camera to finally give the iPad 2 a decent camera.

Would you buy such a device, one that trades a high resolution screen for power and battery life? I know some would, some wouldn’t. Personally I would have liked some sort of screen update, just not one that comes with so much baggage. I think a lot of people who use the iPad for business and things like that would happily make the trade though, as it would make it a true all day computing device that doesn’t care if you leave the screen on for hours at an end. On the other hand, that new screen has a lot of people spellbound, and it helps with a lot of business related tasks as well by opening up for a better reading experience on the thing. A hard choice indeed, but that’s kinda the point: when a new device makes so many sacrifices that an alternative version without its main selling point can be equally attractive, that product definitely has some serious issues.

Pocketables does not accept targeted advertising, phony guest posts, paid reviews, etc. Help us keep this way with support on Patreon!

Andreas Ødegård

Andreas Ødegård is more interested in aftermarket (and user created) software and hardware than chasing the latest gadgets. His day job as a teacher keeps him interested in education tech and takes up most of his time.