The Galaxy S III Mini is frankly a pointless phone

gsiii mini - for some reason we don't have an alt tag here

Here in Norway- and in many other countries- phones are often sold unlocked, at the full retail price. This means that people often shop by price, and price differences can be quite substantial. Samsung is trying to tap this market with its Galaxy S III Mini, a phone that uses its bigger brother’s name to get attention for itself. Unfortunately, that tactic is working, and it’s not a good thing.

The problem with the S III Mini is that it’s roughly the same price as the older S II, which is still being sold all over the world. While the S III Mini is in many ways a budget device though, the S II was the flagship phone only a year ago, and the budget market hasn’t come far enough yet to beat older flagship devices. When you actually start comparing the two, this becomes very obvious. The two devices have the same resolution AMOLED screen, just on a different sized screen- 4 inches for the S III mini, 4.3 for the S II. Despite the screen size difference, the two phones are practically identical in size and weight, with the S II’s smaller thickness making up for the extra couple of millimeters of length.

The camera is where the difference really start showing. For some reason, Samsung only put a 5 megapixel camera with 720p recording in the S III Mini. Resolution isn’t everything, and there’s plenty of differences between devices sporting 8 megapixel cameras, but there’s an obvious difference here up to the 8 megapixel, 1080p-capable camera on the S II. I think the camera really shows how this is a full price budget model, rather than a discounted flagship model.

The S II pulls further ahead with benchmarks. The S III Mini’s dual core CPU is clocked at lower speeds, and it shows in benchmarks. Samsung has a tendency to put all sorts of chips inside its devices lately, instead of sticking with the same series as it did back in the S II days. Again it shows the S III Mini is a budget model, when it’s outperformed by a 1.5 year older phone.

To finish off the S II’s dominance, it comes with a larger battery, with a higher rated battery life. That’s without even upgrading the battery, which can be done for next to nothing, without really making the device any larger or moving away from official Samsung equipment.

The only area I’ve managed to find where the S III Mini wins is the Bluetooth version, which is 4.0 instead of 3.0. There are some accessories out there that are therefore compatible with the S III Mini but not the S II, however I don’t really see many people picking that feature over the areas where the S II wins.

When you put all of these things together, the S III Mini is a phone I can’t understand the point of. With the two being equally priced, even favoring the S II in some sales I’ve seen, the S III Mini seems like a waste of shelf space. I’m guessing production cost is lower, as it should be for an inferior phone, and I assume that there are more than a few customers out there who’d rather walk out the door with a mini version of something with a III on the end than something with a II on the end. What prompted me to write this post was seeing exactly such a case, where someone had bought an S III Mini without really doing any research. Pointing out this issue prompted a case of buyer’s remorse.

There have been rumors of a cheaper iPhone over the last few days, and those are rumors I believe are garbage, like most rumors. Apple is currently selling three generations of the iPhone, at different price levels, and that’s a system I’m very much a fan of. It prolongs the life of a phone model, makes sure that what’s being sold at a lower price is still a quality product, makes for less clutter on the market, and makes it easier to get accessories for a device. This is the system I think Samsung should have adopted as well, and it pains me to see products like the S III Mini hit the market.

Pocketables does not accept targeted advertising, phony guest posts, paid reviews, etc. Help us keep this way with support on Patreon!
become a patron button - for some reason we don't have an alt tag here

Andreas Ødegård

Andreas Ødegård is more interested in aftermarket (and user created) software and hardware than chasing the latest gadgets. His day job as a teacher keeps him interested in education tech and takes up most of his time.

Avatar of Andreas Ødegård

10 thoughts on “The Galaxy S III Mini is frankly a pointless phone

  • Avatar of joe
    January 10, 2013 at 7:52 am
    Permalink

    The point of the phone is to sell a cheaper item for the same price as last year’s model. Samsung will sell plently of these to people who don’t understand specs because they’ll see S3 next to S2 and think it’s a no-brainer. From the point of view of someone who knows their tech, it’s a pretty useless device, but from a business standpoint it’s pretty smart on Samsung’s part.

    Reply
  • Avatar of John Freml
    January 10, 2013 at 8:46 am
    Permalink

    Not to mention a lot of people I’ve talked to simply don’t like the bigger smartphone screens. As smartphones get bigger, I think we’ll see a growing market for smaller phones emerge – people with little hands don’t like being forced to use both hands to text, for example! :)

    Reply
  • Avatar of Alternate Andreas
    January 10, 2013 at 1:01 pm
    Permalink

    I don’t think it’s a pointless phone at all. It’s meant for the non-US market which includes people who don’t have the ability to pay monthly plans or phones that cost hundreds even after subsidies.

    It’s no different than an iPhone 4S being a smaller/slower phone than the iPhone 5. One’s cheaper and uses cheaper materials than the other, and is intended for a different consumer. In the same way, the S III mini is meant for a different consumer than the S III.

    Reply
    • Avatar of Andreas Ødegård
      January 10, 2013 at 1:03 pm
      Permalink

      This is the non-US market we’re talking about. That’s where it costs the same as the S II

      Reply
      • Avatar of Alternate Andreas
        January 10, 2013 at 1:08 pm
        Permalink

        But do people really want an S II, when they can buy a S III mini? Consumers look for keywords, not specifications.

        Reply
        • Avatar of Andreas Ødegård
          January 10, 2013 at 1:10 pm
          Permalink

          People who realize their mistake have been seen running back to the store:

          PS: Stop using site emails that don’t belong to you as your contact email. It causes my thumbnail to load for your comments and leaves me having to edit it out manually.

          Reply
          • Avatar of Alternate Andreas
            January 10, 2013 at 1:32 pm
            Permalink

            I think if people are happy with what they buy, they needn’t worry about what other (outdated) choices there are. Especially for a budget phone.

            PS: Duly noted.

          • Avatar of Andreas Ødegård
            January 10, 2013 at 1:34 pm
            Permalink

            How is a device that is still being sold, has better specs and still gets software updates outdated?

            And you’re still doing the email thing. Don’t.

          • Avatar of Alternate Andreas
            January 10, 2013 at 1:43 pm
            Permalink

            In the iPad mini is still a better device than the iPad 2, even though they’re both still for sale and the 2 has a bigger screen than the mini, the product of choice is still the newer device.

          • Avatar of Andreas Ødegård
            January 10, 2013 at 1:44 pm
            Permalink

            Lots of people still buy the iPad 2 just because of the screen size. Also, in that case, the newer device is better. In this case it isn’t.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.