What I want to see in 2013 for mobile and not-so-mobile devices

Devices circle - for some reason we don't have an alt tag here

2012 had a lot of interesting developments in the Android and HTC EVO worlds, and the technology world in general – we now have Chromebooks, the Microsoft Surface, Android tablets, phablets, and a few new Apple products all over the market, competing for eyespace.

If there is one thing I’d like to see in 2013, it’s that all of them should work together and be extensions of one another, rather than individual competing proprietary platforms.

Chrome, the browser, taught me a while ago the value of a networked browser. Anything I searched, and any site I visited in the past, was available from any other device capable of running Chrome, including my EVO, as long as I had my username and password to retrieve it. With the advent of Chrome Remote Desktop, even if I’d saved a file on my Mac and was at work on my PC, as long as Mac was still running, I could just jump in and get the file.

To step back in time a bit, email protocols like IMAP and Exchange allow multiple devices to access the exact same inbox. One of my employers is using Google Mail and Calendar with an iPhone, a Mac running Office 2012, and a PC running Office 2010, and everything works more or less the same. An email deleted on one is deleted everywhere. All devices see the same inbox.

Why do we have a different expectation of our mobile devices than we do of our email and our browsers? Why should I put down Angry Birds on my tablet when my wife needs it, and not be able to pick up at the same point on my EVO? The only difference between my tablet and my phone is that the data save directory exists on the device, and not in the cloud somewhere.

On Android, we already have a sync service that runs in the background. Across all devices, we have services like Dropbox, so it doesn’t seem like it would be that difficult for a platform to be incorporated in most applications that simply syncs the data on close, or checks for a newer revision on open.

With cloud-applications like Google Drive, you can save your document from a PC, load it up on an Android and make a change, and then finish off the thing on a Mac later in the day. Why do we have to have platform-anchored data any more? Why can my iPad version of Bad Piggies and my Sony Tablet running Android not let me continue my piggish fights?

Applications like Bluestacks allow you to run Android apps on PC and Macs, VMWare allows you to run Mac, Linux, etc. on a PC, and Parallels lets you run your PC apps on a Mac. The virtualization and abstraction Tower of Babel has been created, and it’s time to start thinking about the device not as a Mac, PC, Chromebook, Android, iOS, Windows, Linux, etc. It’s an extension, a window to what we want to see.

So that’s what I’d like to see this year: apps from the App Store, from Google Play, Windows Marketplace, etc., that work seamlessly from one device to another. I think the idea to strive to forget is that a device is its applications, and what should be embraced in a device is an extension of you that can be accessed from anything you want it on.

Pocketables does not accept targeted advertising, phony guest posts, paid reviews, etc. Help us keep this way with support on Patreon!
become a patron button - for some reason we don't have an alt tag here

Paul E King

Paul King started with GoodAndEVO in 2011, which merged with Pocketables, and as of 2018 he's evidently the owner. He lives in Nashville, works at a film production company, is married with two kids. Facebook | Twitter | Donate | More posts by Paul | Subscribe to Paul's posts

Avatar of Paul E King

6 thoughts on “What I want to see in 2013 for mobile and not-so-mobile devices

  • Avatar of Robin
    January 2, 2013 at 12:14 pm
    Permalink

    The big reason I see is people like me. I don’t want my info stored in a cloud. I don’t want to sign up to their agreements and I certainly don’t want them to have kind of access to my info. This privacy issue is just going to grow. Now if someone wants to create a program where I can use my own pc to be the storage server then I would be interest. Otherwise it’s just to envasive.

    Reply
    • Avatar of Andreas Ødegård
      January 2, 2013 at 12:54 pm
      Permalink

      You’ve been able to do exactly that for years.

      Reply
    • Avatar of Paul E King
      January 2, 2013 at 12:59 pm
      Permalink

      Doesn’t need to be stored in a cloud, just needs to be stored somewhere.

      While cloud-based Angry Birds saves may be a security issues, device to device access most likely isn’t. Whole lot of ways this can be done without bringing in other sites…

      Hell, tap the two devices together to establish a base, then store only encrypted changedata (like Rsync data) even if someone got it without the base it’s useless.

      These data file updates are small… should not require much storage at all as long as the base is around… finally can use that NFC tap for something useful – pairing a base image.

      Reply
  • Avatar of Andreas Ødegård
    January 2, 2013 at 1:01 pm
    Permalink

    In all fairness, it’s mostly game developers that are this stupid right now. Most other services have some sort of sync, at least if you pick the right ones out of various apps that do the same thing. I do agree that game developers need to get a grip though. I don’t know how many times I’ve simply stopped playing a game because of the lack of such sync, and since it’s often been a desire to switch to another OS that’s been the issue, the lack of such a feature is affecting the company’s profits by making people who would otherwise buy the game twice simply stop playing it altogether

    Reply
    • Avatar of Paul E King
      January 2, 2013 at 2:45 pm
      Permalink

      I think it’s something that needs to be system level.. allow for saving in /data/cloudpod or something that is everywhere to every device.

      I don’t think developers need to start jumping on the hire hosted data storage wagon when this is something that can be fixed at a system level (or close) across the board.

      Reply
      • Avatar of Andreas Ødegård
        January 2, 2013 at 3:38 pm
        Permalink

        System level solutions is the last thing I want, because each company would just push its own shit. Microsoft’s Skydrive, Google’s Drive, and Apple’s iCloud. The apps that do syncing properly today allow you to choose where to sync, and I don’t think that feature should be taken away.I think every app should be able to sync data using Dropbox, Skydrive, box.net, etc. If it doesn’t happen on developer level, it won’t happen. You can always hope, but I prefer pushing for the more realistic approach.

        Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.