AndroidGood and EVO

HTC EVO 4G LTE vs HTC One, round 1: Camera

I’ve got my hands on an activated Sprint HTC One on Sprint’s network for the next nine days. Therefore, I have decided to put it head to head against the HTC EVO 4G LTE since, well, that’s what I have activated at the moment and I’ve been pretty happy with my EVO camera so far. For purposes of this comparison, I flashed my EVO 4G LTE back to a Sense-based ROM, so this is HTC software and hardware vs HTC software and hardware.

Most of the photos were taken by holding the devices right next to each other with the lenses at approximately the same height. All pictures (except the currency pictures) were taken within five seconds of each other, so there should be no real environmental change from the EVO 4G LTE to the One. The day was overcast and dreary, the sort of day that makes you want to sneeze for no reason.

The EVO 4G LTE has a camera resolution of 8MP, while the HTC One only has four but uses a different capture technology which is better in lower lighting conditions.


Still shots (left is the EVO 4G LTE, right is the One):

HTC EVO 4G LTE catHTC One cat

What I notice about this most is that the grass in the shot by the HTC One really looks a little more detailed. The white shading on the cat’s neck looks more realistic on the One, although the dimness of the day is better reflected on the EVO 4G LTE.

HTC EVO 4G lte purple plantHTC One purple plant

In this photo of the purple plant and plastic cup, the HTC One loses some of the detail on the brick damage by over-saturating and normalizing the brick. Interestingly enough, though, the EVO loses detail on the back concrete wall.

To my colorblind eyes, the One’s photo of the plants looks like they actually are in normal lighting; however, they were not in normal lighting. It was overcast and icky.

Most importantly here, and you’ll need to click on the photos and enlarge them to see this, the purple plant has hairs that string off of it. On the EVO 4G LTE you can see them very clearly, and on the One the hairs have been blurred into the photo. It doesn’t appear to be a resolution issue, but more a photo enhancement one.

Chances are you’re not looking for plant hair details in 99% of the photos you’re going to take, though.

EVO 4G LTE vs One in resolution

Hair on the leaf shown – more foreground detail on the EVO 4G LTE, more background on the One

HTC EVO 4G LTE bushesHTC One bushes

Neither camera caught this scene quite right, but I think the HTC One managed slightly better.

HTC EVO 4G LTE Weed gardenHTC One weed garden

EVO 4G LTE overexposed the whites losing detail in the fence. Detail seems to be lost on the bricks on the One. Grass looks more like it actually was on the One, but I believe the EVO rendered this better. This time I think resolution may be the cause.

HTC EVO 4G LTE two dollar billHTC One two dollar bill

HTC EVO 4G LTE taking a picture of the HTC OneHTC One taking a picture of the HTC EVO 4G LTE

On the left is a picture taken by the EVO 4G LTE of the One’s screen taking a picture of a stack of two dollar bills. On the right is the One taking a picture of the screen of the EVO 4G LTE.

The EVO fails pretty badly at taking a picture of a screen, while the One does significantly better but loses brightness in the background when it does.

HTC EVO 4G LTE red chairHTC One red chair

In the battle of the red chairs, the resolution on the EVO 4G LTE wins, but the dreariness of the day was more accurately reflected in the sad tones of the One. Also the One looks more real zoomed out.

I did a few extreme lowlight photos on both cameras. The One won, but the photos were pretty bad.

A few things to note for the dreary daylight test are that the EVO required multiple shots on some of these, and it also really messed up when the money was close to the lens (it would focus and then focus to the wrong place the instant I pressed the capture button). For one-shot close up pictures, the One won.

So far, I’m a little more impressed with the One’s camera than I am with the EVO 4G LTE, but there’s more to a phone than a camera that performs well on an overcast day and I’ll be playing with that the next few days.

Pocketables does not accept targeted advertising, phony guest posts, paid reviews, etc. Help us keep this way with support on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!

Paul E King

Paul King started with GoodAndEVO in 2011, which merged with Pocketables, and as of 2018 he's evidently the owner. He lives in Nashville, works at a film production company, is married with two kids. Facebook | Twitter | Donate | More posts by Paul | Subscribe to Paul's posts

Avatar of Paul E King

8 thoughts on “HTC EVO 4G LTE vs HTC One, round 1: Camera

  • Avatar of melissa

    I’m looking forward to reading this series. I have the EVO 4G LTE and like it for the most part but I feel like the camera lacks. It’s one of the few things I like better about my husband’s S4. And side-by-side, the iPhone usually outperforms on pics. So this was interesting.

  • Avatar of spencere311

    I had the evo 4g lte and now I have the one. I have noticed a world of difference in the camera. If I go back and look at the photos I took when I had the evo they they don’t compare the the ones I have taken with my One. It’s odd to me that yours came out so similar.

    • as in the pictures I’m taking with the One aren’t as good as they should be, or the pictures with the EVO 4G LTE are better than they should be?

      Could you just be becoming a better photographer? :)

      Something I noticed a while back is that my 4G LTE photos were starting to look dim, dull, out of focus. The lens was in serious need of cleaning, so I cleaned it well

      • Avatar of spencere311

        The pictures you took with your evo are really good. And you are probably right. I probably have gotten a little better with taking pictures.

  • Can you do a camera test in lower light conditions? That’s the Ones strong point, really would like to see the difference. Glad to see a positive post instead of the usual Spint and HTC bashing.

  • When I was AB testing Sprint and T-Mobile, I came to much the same conclusion. And coincidentally, I was reminded of these facts just a short while ago.

    I took pictures of my office… the colors from the EVO LTE looked more vivid, but the One was more true-to-life. And the sensor with twice as many pixels will, of course, show more detail under zoom/cropping, but nobody should ever zoom/crop a smartphone picture. ;)

    Funny story: I took some panoramics of U.S. Cellular Field, and I have instant upload turned on for Dropbox. When I was going through the panoramics to pick one to have printed, one stood out as simply better, so I began working with it. Then I realized the original was only about 1.5MB, compared to the others that were clocking in a little over 3MB. So I was worried that I was working with a re-sized image or something, and began digging through the One looking for the original… but I could not find an image with that time-stamp. Then I realized the image was actually taken with the EVO. It looked way better than the One, unfortunately… but the One does rock in low-light, which is how I take most of my pictures.

    Office shots:

    US Cellular Field:

    P.S. The sweep panorama on the One is way easier to get good results from than the EVO LTE’s panorama functionality (which, for those who don’t know, needs the position of the camera lens to be completely static to get good results… so pinch the top and bottom of the phone at the lens with your fingers and pivot around that point in space).

  • Avatar of Zachary Jacob Zblewski

    We have the same case on our EVOs. I was like “HOW DID HE GET MY PHONE?!?”.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *